As of Monday, August 24, clicking on the link: https://www.schools.nyc.gov/calendar produces the message: No items were found.
That’s certainly reassuring.
Nonetheless, the majority of stakeholders, from Mayor Bill De Blasio to School Chancellor Richard Carranza to UFT President Michael Mulgrew to, oh, yeah, parents and students (remember them?) are operating on the assumption that the first day of the 2020-2021 NYC public school year will be Thursday, September 10. (Charter, Catholic, and independent schools have set a variety of different dates, most of them earlier.)
At a press conference on Wednesday, August 19, Mulgrew said, “We don’t believe it is possible for schools to open on Sept. 10…. It might be one of the biggest debacles in the history of the city.”
1) Schools must be stocked with cleaning supplies, PPE and proper ventilation.
2) Each school must have a clear plan of action and a COVID response team in place.
3) Every single person (students and teachers) must be screened and have evidence that they do not have coronavirus before being allowed to enter a school building. “If you do not have positive antibodies, within 10 days of a school opening, you must go to a covid test and have a negative result before you will be allowed to enter that school building.”
Those needing to get tested would include 1.1 million students, 75,000 teachers and thousands of principals, cafeteria workers and custodians.
NYC’s current average for receiving COVID-19 test results is 10-14 days.
If these demands are not met, Mulgrew said, “We are prepared to… take a job action.”
That sounds nice, doesn’t it? If they deem that schools have not taken adequate precautions to ensure the safety of their members, the United Federations of Teachers will take action and do their jobs, teaching remotely instead of entering school buildings.
That’s not what a job action is. A job action is a nice — and deliberately obscure — way to say strike. NYC teachers are threatening to strike in the same way Arizona teachers recently staged a sick-out.
New York state’s Public Employees’ Fair Employment Act, aka the Taylor Law, prohibits strikes by public employees like teachers. Mulgrew isn’t concerned.
"If we feel that a school is not safe, we are prepared to go to court and take action. If a court determines we are breaking the Taylor Law, so be it."— UFT (@UFT) August 19, 2020
-UFT President Mulgrew
Where things really get interesting is that in pushing back school reopenings, the UFT is open to proceeding with 100% remote instruction. Though as we reported here, teachers also claim they received no training over the summer in how to make remote learning more effective than it proved in the spring — any parent saying so was accused of teacher bashing, however.
No one was trained in remote learning. The number is zero. I taught summer school. Our “training” was watching a sales pitch video from and Ed tech company and then a useless zoom about ilearn that failed to mention that the system is glitchy and poorly designed.— Susan J. (@zamba2samba) August 21, 2020
Also on Wednesday, August 19, Chalkbeat reporter Reema Amin heroically live tweeted a marathon 10 HOUR LONG Public Education Policy meeting chaired by Chancellor Carranza, where the majority of public comments from students and parents supported a delay in opening, and 100% remote instruction in the meantime. (You can read the entire thread, here.)
From the beginning, Mayor De Blasio has insisted that opening schools for hybrid instruction is what the majority of his constituents want. Almost two-thirds, 74 percent, opted for in-person learning while only 26 percent signed up for all-remote, he claimed.
Critics instantly questioned those numbers, pointing out that the mayor was extrapolating from a survey where less than 30% of NYC families responded.
Parents had until August 7, 2020 to decide whether or not to register their child for hybrid or remote learning in the fall. But it wasn’t exactly a straightforward decision.
Families were told that if they chose hybrid, they could opt into remote at any time. However, if they chose remote, there would only be four designated time periods – the first one coming in November – when their child could return back to school.
Despite what elected official might think, NYC parents aren’t stupid. Dozens of them told me that they were selecting the hybrid option because it was the more pragmatic choice, and they could still change their mind up until the first day of school – and beyond.
Furthermore, all parents who didn’t respond to the survey, were automatically assumed to be opting for hybrid, which, naturally, boosted those numbers. There are 1.1 million students in the NYC school system. Only 322,572 had filled out the survey as of August 7.
A week later, 40,000 more students requested to be added to the remote learning rolls.
And, despite attempts to paint those choosing remote learning as rich, white, “privileged” parents who don’t need to return to work, can afford childcare, and/or to stay home and supervise their child’s education:
Whoa. New poll from @EdTrustNY throws cold water on de Blasio's claim that parents want schools to reopen. "Black, Latinx, and low-income parents are disproportionately likely to be wary of reopening school buildings— Christina Veiga (@cveiga) August 20, 2020
this fall." https://t.co/KHqRlHJ5Nr pic.twitter.com/iyZTCbyvoC
On Thursday, August 20, Mayor De Blasio introduced a “Back To School Pledge.”
He began with the words, “We work for the parents and the kids of New York City.”
Mayor responds that families "need their kids to be in school in person." "I work for the parents. I work for the kids of this city… I'm not going to damn them" to "less education than they deserve."— Christina Veiga (@cveiga) August 21, 2020
But if parents want to delay schools reopening, and students want to delay schools reopening, and teachers want to delay schools reopening, and principals want to delay schools reopening, then who exactly does the mayor believe he’s working for as he bulldozes ahead, doing the opposite?