New York City General Education public school Kindergarten applications for 2020 were due on Tuesday, January 21. At the last minute, the Department of Education extended the deadline to Sunday, January 26. It was absolutely, positively not due to technical glitches with the very expensive MySchools Parent Portal. (For tips on how to circumvent the technical glitches that absolutely, positively did not happen, go to the Comments section of this post.)
In the weeks leading up to the ultimately missed deadline, I received dozens of emails from parents asking if they could opt for the school closer to their work, rather than the one closer to their home, because it would make drop-off and pick up more convenient. I explained that while families could rank any 12 schools in NYC on their application, priority went to children who lived in the zone, then to those who lived in the district, then borough, then citywide. (For more tips on strategic ranking, watch the video, below.)
Their queries did give me an idea, though.
Rather than prioritizing public school admissions by residential address (or going to a whole city choice model like San Francisco, former stomping grounds of NYC Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza, where the results were… less than optimal), parents’ work addresses were used instead?
NYC has the most segregated schools in the country — we’re home to nine of the country’s 50 most economically-segregating school district borders.
Moving from a residential to a work address model would aid desegregation.
“But, how?” you might ask. “Won’t that mean all those investment bankers’ kids would be going to the same school?” (Spoiler: They already do. Check out the demographics at NYC’s “good” non-charter public schools.)
Why, yes, they would. But you know who else would then be zoned for their schools? The investment banker’s secretaries’ kids. And the kids of the janitorial staff. And the ones of the folks who sell them overly-expensive coffee and artisanal sandwiches next door. And the cops from the local precinct. And the CVS/Duane Reade/bank teller/cell phone store employees, from management to shelf stockers.
Tell me that a similar diversity of kids would all be living in the same residential school zone.
Businesses would have self-serving motivation (the best kind) to take an interest in education. If they knew that the quality of the local school was an incentive to attract and retain the most productive employees, they’d be more likely to donate money and make sure “their” school was the best it could be.
Meanwhile, to ensure that no one is “trapped” in a job any more than they’re “trapped” in their apartment, switching jobs would be like switching addresses now. You’d have the option of staying where you were or transferring to your new zoned school.
“But what about the unemployed?” I can also hear you asking (I hear a lot of voices in my head). “Not everyone has a job, you know!”
Just like now, those who are unemployed can still rank up to 12 schools on their application. Work addresses priorities are just that: priorities, not absolutes. You wouldn’t have to go to school in your work zone, no matter what, the same as you currently don’t have to go to school in your residential zone, if you get in somewhere else. And there can still be unzoned school options.
Conversely, in the case of two working parents, you can designate one primary work address, like for a child with parents living in two separate zones.
And, yes, stay at home moms and dads will be allowed to claim home as their place of business. While nannies and other domestic workers can use their employer’s addresses.
Yeah, well, about that… you can’t win them all.
When the school calls in the middle of the day to tell you your child is sick, you don’t have to schlepp halfway across town and maybe even into another borough to pick them up. You’ll be much closer by and can get there faster.
So to reiterate: The all important diversity, more money for schools via business investment, a shorter commute to pick up your feverish, cranky kid.
Would you support such an admissions change?
Let us know in the Comments, below!